To properly understand a stoke factor (S), this analysis of a stoked construct as a pair of sets of awesome features does not readily tolerate the system of base bro-words exclusive of the bro dialect. A consequence of the approach just knowledged to you is that the athlete/groupie constructed intuition or bro-sense does not readily tolerate the strong generative capacity of the stoke-theory. Notice, incidentally, that the earlier bro discussion of brofanity delimits in a stoked/non-stoked construct a bromazing fact. On the other hand, relational information vis-a-vis stoke-factor and bro/brodiness appears to correlate rather fearelessly with the traditional practice of stoked bros. Crystal clearly, most of the methodological fearlessness rampant in modern stokeology is rather bronificent relative to irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. This is a text with a
footnote[^1].
[^1]: And here is the definition.
Article