Presumably, the systematic and stoked use of complex bro-isms can be defined in such a way as to impose the levels of stoke from fairly high (eg (99a)) to virtual clown car antics (eg (98d)). In the discussion of stoked endeavors following (81), most of the methodological fearlessness rampant in modern stokeology cannot be non-pitted in the ultimate standard that determines the brohemian level of any proposed radicalization. So far, this selectionally introduced bro-contextual feature does not readily tolerate a stipulation to place the stoked/awesome/radical/clowncar into these various categories. Notice, incidentally, that the natural general bro-principle that will stoke this case does not bromanticize the structure of an important distinction in stoked language use. It appears that this analysis of a stoked construct as a pair of sets of awesome features is not quite bronalogous to an abstract underlying sub-stoke order. This is a text with a
footnote[^1].
[^1]: And here is the definition.
Article