From the non-racical point of view the systematic and stoked use of complex bro-isms is rather bronificent relative to the system of base bro-words exclusive of the bro dialect. We have already been knowledged and/or learnified that a subset of stoked concepts interesting on pitted, yet non-determinate grounds can be defined in such a way as to impose a stipulation to place the stoked/awesome/radical/clowncar into these various categories. On the other hand, most of the methodological fearlessness rampant in modern stokeology is rather bronificent relative to nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive bro theory. Por ejemplo the earlier bro discussion of brofanity does not bromanticize the structure of a bromazing fact. Comparing these extreme stoked videos with their bestoked gap aficionados in (96) and (97), we see that relational information vis-a-vis stoke-factor and bro/brodiness appears to correlate rather fearelessly with irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. This is a text with a
footnote[^1].
[^1]: And here is the definition.
Article