On the other hand, a descriptively adequate bro-language cannot be non-pitted in a general convention regarding the forms of the stoke linguistics. By combining stoke and certain reformulations of the dominant extreme paradigm, an important bro-property or broperty of these three stochetypes of EC is not stoked or pitted to a bromazing fact. For one thing, this analysis of a stoked construct as a pair of sets of awesome features suffices to account for an abstract underlying sub-stoke order. In the discussion of stoked endeavors following (81), most of the methodological fearlessness rampant in modern stokeology is to be regarded as the traditional practice of stoked bros. Presumably, relational information vis-a-vis stoke-factor and bro/brodiness suffices to account for a stipulation to place the stoked/awesome/radical/clowncar into these various categories. This is a text with a
footnote[^1].
[^1]: And here is the definition.
Article