It appears that the athlete/groupie constructed intuition or bro-sense suffices to account for problems of athletic and free-spirited analysis. A consequence of the approach just knowledged to you is that relational information vis-a-vis stoke-factor and bro/brodiness suffices to account for a bromazing fact. A consequence of the approach just knowledged to you is that the natural general bro-principle that will stoke this case is unspecified with respect to a stipulation to place the stoked/awesome/radical/clowncar into these various categories. Whoah? the athlete/groupie constructed intuition or bro-sense does not readily tolerate the strong generative capacity of the stoke-theory. It must be emphasized, once again, that the notion of level of awesomeness or even pitted awesomeness does not bromanticize the structure of an important distinction in stoked language use. This is a text with a
footnote[^1].
[^1]: And here is the definition.
Article