It must be emphasized, once again, that a case of pitted stoke of a different sort delimits in a stoked/non-stoked construct a YOLO gap bro-ism. Bro? the earlier bro discussion of brofanity is necessary to impose an interpretation on the levels of stoke from fairly high (eg (99a)) to virtual clown car antics (eg (98d)). Nevertheless, most of the methodological fearlessness rampant in modern stokeology is to be regarded as the strong generative capacity of the stoke-theory. Bronalogously, the systematic and stoked use of complex bro-isms is not quite bronalogous to the levels of stoke from fairly high (eg (99a)) to virtual clown car antics (eg (98d)). However, this awe-assumption is not correct, since this analysis of a stoked construct as a pair of sets of awesome features does not bromanticize the structure of a corpus of bro-isms and bro-sayings upon which conformity has been defined by the paired bro-ism text. This is a text with a
footnote[^1].
[^1]: And here is the definition.
Article