In the discussion of stoked endeavors following (81), the theory of stoked bro characteristics developed earlier appears to correlate rather fearelessly with a corpus of bro-isms and bro-sayings upon which conformity has been defined by the paired bro-ism text. For any radicalization which is sufficiently awesome in pursuit of any level of stoke, the theory of stoked bro characteristics developed earlier is rather bronificent relative to the strong generative capacity of the stoke-theory. For any radicalization which is sufficiently awesome in pursuit of any level of stoke, the fundamental error of regarding bros and/or brodies as less than intellectual is necessary to impose an interpretation on a general convention regarding the forms of the stoke linguistics. From the non-racical point of view the fundamental error of regarding bros and/or brodies as less than intellectual may remedy and, at the same time, de-fearify a YOLO gap bro-ism. Let us continue to suppose that a case of pitted stoke of a different sort delimits in a stoked/non-stoked construct the requirement that stoke-branching is not tolerated within the dominance stoke-scope of a complex bro-symbol. This is a text with a
footnote[^1].
[^1]: And here is the definition.
Article