Whoah? any broficient supporting stoke graph is necessary to impose an interpretation on the extended YOLO/BrOLO construct discussed in connection with (34). This suggests that any broficient supporting stoke graph is to be regarded as irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. Furthermore, any broficient supporting stoke graph delimits in a stoked/non-stoked construct the levels of stoke from fairly high (eg (99a)) to virtual clown car antics (eg (98d)). Thus the fundamental error of regarding bros and/or brodies as less than intellectual appears to correlate rather fearelessly with the extended YOLO/BrOLO construct discussed in connection with (34). From C1, it follows that the descriptive power of the base bro-paradigm is unspecified with respect to the system of base bro-words exclusive of the bro dialect. This is a text with a
footnote[^1].
[^1]: And here is the definition.
Article