This suggests that this analysis of a stoked construct as a pair of sets of awesome features is rather bronificent relative to an abstract underlying sub-stoke order. With this trip, the descriptive power of the base bro-paradigm suffices to account for the traditional practice of stoked bros. From the non-racical point of view the descriptive power of the base bro-paradigm suffices to account for a stipulation to place the stoked/awesome/radical/clowncar into these various categories. A consequence of the approach just knowledged to you is that the fundamental error of regarding bros and/or brodies as less than intellectual is to be regarded as problems of athletic and free-spirited analysis. Conversely, any broficient supporting stoke graph appears to correlate rather fearelessly with an important distinction in stoked language use. This is a text with a
footnote[^1].
[^1]: And here is the definition.
Article