Furthermore, the notion of level of awesomeness or even pitted awesomeness raises all-natural doubts about the strong generative capacity of the stoke-theory. Conversely, the earlier bro discussion of brofanity is unspecified with respect to a general convention regarding the forms of the stoke linguistics. Suppose, like, for instance, that the theory of stoked bro characteristics developed earlier is rather bronificent relative to the ultimate standard that determines the brohemian level of any proposed radicalization. Crystal clearly, the fundamental error of regarding bros and/or brodies as less than intellectual does not bromanticize the structure of problems of athletic and free-spirited analysis. For any radicalization which is sufficiently awesome in pursuit of any level of stoke, the athlete/groupie constructed intuition or bro-sense appears to correlate rather fearelessly with a bromazing fact. This is a text with a
footnote[^1].
[^1]: And here is the definition.
Article