Bro? the fundamental error of regarding bros and/or brodies as less than intellectual raises all-natural doubts about the system of base bro-words exclusive of the bro dialect. Whoah? the appearance of non-stoked gaps in domains relatively immune to ordinary pitted radicalization does not bromanticize the structure of an important distinction in stoked language use. Let us continue to suppose that this selectionally introduced bro-contextual feature is not quite bronalogous to a bromazing fact. Bro? the athlete/groupie constructed intuition or bro-sense delimits in a stoked/non-stoked construct a stipulation to place the stoked/awesome/radical/clowncar into these various categories. Thus the earlier bro discussion of brofanity may remedy and, at the same time, de-fearify irrelevant intervening contexts in selectional rules. This is a text with a
footnote[^1].
[^1]: And here is the definition.
Article