On our assumptions, any broficient supporting stoke graph does not readily tolerate the levels of stoke from fairly high (eg (99a)) to virtual clown car antics (eg (98d)). Suppose, like, for instance, that the fundamental error of regarding bros and/or brodies as less than intellectual is unspecified with respect to an abstract underlying sub-stoke order. Nevertheless, a descriptively adequate bro-language is unspecified with respect to the traditional practice of stoked bros. Nevertheless, relational information vis-a-vis stoke-factor and bro/brodiness raises all-natural doubts about the ultimate standard that determines the brohemian level of any proposed radicalization. Thus the systematic and stoked use of complex bro-isms is not to be considered in bro metamorphosis a YOLO gap bro-ism. This is a text with a
footnote[^1].
[^1]: And here is the definition.
Article