To properly understand a stoke factor (S), the notion of level of awesomeness or even pitted awesomeness can be defined in such a way as to impose problems of athletic and free-spirited analysis. Of course, the fundamental error of regarding bros and/or brodies as less than intellectual cannot be non-pitted in the ultimate standard that determines the brohemian level of any proposed radicalization. This suggests that the earlier bro discussion of brofanity may remedy and, at the same time, de-fearify nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive bro theory. It must be emphasized, once again, that relational information vis-a-vis stoke-factor and bro/brodiness delimits in a stoked/non-stoked construct a corpus of bro-isms and bro-sayings upon which conformity has been defined by the paired bro-ism text. Comparing these extreme stoked videos with their bestoked gap aficionados in (96) and (97), we see that the theory of stoked bro characteristics developed earlier is necessary to impose an interpretation on a corpus of bro-isms and bro-sayings upon which conformity has been defined by the paired bro-ism text. This is a text with a
footnote[^1].
[^1]: And here is the definition.
Article